New news on how people can get from working to retirement and not worry about income has been issued a week or so ago by Fidelity investments. The old rule that financial planners told clients was that in order to be comfortable for the rest of days a person needed 75% of their pre-retirement income, or investments that would create that amount. Now Fidelity Investments gives a more complex guideline that states someone need eight times their ending income in a lump sum to meet basic retirement needs. The Fidelity have calculated check points at certain ages on how much to save but I’ll defer that for another day. The end result of their study is that if your final income before retirement is $60,000 you’ll need about $500,000 in savings. That plus social security should, according to the folks at Fidelity, provide just enough money to meet basic retirement needs.
Hold the phone! While accumulation is probably the most important part of this equation, not to mention return on investment, there is an unspoken, unwritten assumption not covered by the financial experts. Actually there are several. The one that most seem to gloss over the most is assuming that a retiree will only use 4-5% of the pot of money to live on. In fact I’ll bet if you ask a retiree about how to manage income at retirement they’ll tell you that they will live on either earnings or interest derived from their savings.
For many low to middle-income retirees this is really wrong. A retiree would be much better off buying a fixed single premium immediate annuity (or several) from Best rated insurance companies and get a lifetime guaranteed income! Not only would this income be higher than any income plan an individual or their broker could create with any certainty, there would also be less grief and worry. There is almost an un-natural aversion by retirees to dipping into their savings principal. If asked why they would give up retirement income certainty in exchange for the vagaries of the investment world most middle to lower income folks would say they’d like to leave a little something to their kids, charity or a special cause. A fixed annuity usually cannot do that. The annuity uses both earnings and principal to provide a steady guaranteed income. For most low and some middle-income retirees this is something they would prefer to ignore. As Boomers now stumble en masse into retirement the entire retirement income planning concept has to be reworked. At the very least retirees should be taught how to use both principal and earnings on their investment to create a higher and more comfortable retirement income.
MarketWatch Reported 10 Cities That Cannot Turn Around Housing- California and Florida plus Las Vegas. Huge surplus on both sides of the U.S.
10 Stocks Least Addicted to QE3…I did a little chart searching last week and everything I read looked yummy…but, what isn’t dependent on the Government Fed fix?… Apple, Facebook, Newmont Mining, CF Industries, Proctor & Gamble, 3M, Johnson & Johnson, Kinder Morgan, and (for some reason) Total, S.A.
Chinese Culture is Not American! Home Depot, Mattel, Tesco (UK) and Best Buy are getting their…you know what’s handed to them…in the mysterious land way over there. You’d think these large multi-nationals would have done some basic homework before committing billions to building infrastructure and establishing themselves in a completely foreign land. But I guess not! Home Depot, and others, according to WSJ, have gone through a painful and expensive learning process that the Chinese are not like you and me. HD finds that the Chinese are not do-it-yourselfers and more like do-it-for me’ers. Mattel has seen the light as Chinese kids read and study and don’t play with toys and dolls. Wal-Mart is opening fewer stores in 2013. Best Buy has learned that the Chinese want dishwashers, clothes dryers and not tech toys. Still some companies have gotten it right- Yum Brand Foods and McDonalds seem to have integrated into China.
Raymond J. Lucia, Sr. is a San Diego financial radio host and securities broker. He is under investigation by the SEC for his three bucket approach to investing which the Securities and Exchange Commission claims he has inserted ‘misleading’ information. Ray is not the only one to glom onto the 3 Bucket investment approach. Many insurance companies have that as a selling tool and even the venerated risk analyzer Morningstar positively glows when it reports on what the average investor should do with their money; specifically use the three buckets of (1) immediate (2) intermediate and (3) long-term money. But what Ray Lucia forgot to tell and include in his calculations is the cost of doing business that got him in such trouble. There was that and…oh, yes, the fact that his
recommendations also included nontraded REITS for his clients. These are investments that are not traded on an exchange and only report their values once every 18 months or so. His clients believed that the REITS were much like bonds and a safe fixed investment. Of course they are not. There was that little problem plus he also inputted an inflation factor of 3% when in reality the time period suggested it was more like 5%. Most people mentally catalogue their assets in at least three buckets and there is nothing explicitly wrong with that. It’s in the execution that one gets into trouble. It all comes down to the old saw, ‘Figures can lie and liars can …”,
About 10 Days Ago I was musing… this was while Michigan State was losing to (gasp!) Notre Dame, before the Tigers blew another to the (gasp!) Indians and San Francisco would be handing the Lions a lesson in trying to run the football up the middle. My distraction was wondering what sector would benefit from the Fed buying $40 billion a month in mortgage bonds? And I came to the conclusion that banks, the big banks, should do well. I wasn’t alone in that thinking as the next day the WSJ had an article that suggested the same thing. The reasoning is that while scooping up mortgages it would give housing and the re-fi biz a boost. And, while lower rates could, in the long-term possibly hurt, there is evidence that many of the Bigs trade at 30% discount to tangible book value. Of course the argument that book value can turn on a dime or drop off the like a Lehman is always there for you naysayers. My other thought was home builders but they’ve had a huge run this year and there may not be a lot of gas left in the tank for 2012. Still I think, as does the smart folk on Squawk Box on CNBC, that home builders long-term make some sense. Call me for a list of ideas….
Monday started off as being a little off – like an upset stomach or a touch of the flu. Suddenly out of the blue oil fell $3. Oil doesn’t just drop three bucks for no reason.Calls to various traders and searches produced a lot of dunnos. The fall precipitated other commodities to follow suit. Some finally figured it was an erroneous trade. Others came to the conclusion that it was a lot of traders simply closing positions and the Jewish Holiday left many traders off the floor which left a vacuum. At least that’s the story and so far everyone is sticking with it.
And the new President is… Before the last election I invited a speaker for my clients who worked for Capital Bank and Trust/American Funds. He announced that Obama would win the election and that there would be no recession in 2007. Most of the people in the room, me included, believed him on the one statement and not on the other. We were wrong- totally. Last week David Weidner in his blog reported that Wall Street is firmly behind the President. Not that they are against Romney it is just that Wall Street likes to back and pick the winner. While not happy with the result of our coming election Wall Street seems to have come to grips with the fact that they don’t expect all commerce to halt and all private industry to be immediately nationalized upon the President’s re-election. An unscientific CNBC poll gives the president a 2-1 chance of winning.
Technically the markets are still Bullish…a bit of profit taking during the first half of the week. Oil showed weakness and FedEx reiterated that China was slowing.
The Cult of Gates and Buffett signed up 11 more Billionaires to give their money to charity. So far the ‘Cult’ has recruited 92 families in total to sign a pledge to give away the majority of their wealth while they are living so they can have a hand in what their money will do. There is no consensus on how to spend the money even though the wealthy meet regularly to discuss how to dispose of their billions. Pass the hat and pay off the national debt?
Once Upon a Time…in a small town of Moberly, Mo. a Beverly Hills lawyer by the name of Bruce Cole promised the natives of Moberly that if they built a new facility to manufacture his artificial sweetener he’d move his factory from China to their little town. So the townspeople did just that by organizing a municipal bond offering of $39 million dollars. Yield and tax hungry investors from across the land snapped up the muni’s only to see the project fail and their entire investment go to zero. The town defaulted on the bonds, the project was never built and the lawyer Cole has been charged with taking some of the money and using it to make his mortgage payments on his castle in Beverly Hills. According to Bloomberg lawyer Cole has been arrested and the towns people of Moberly are saddled with a partially finished factory while investors are out $39 million dollars.
Questions call Paul @ 877 783 7080 or write him at pstanley@westminsterfinancial.com. Share this blog with someone who needs someone on their side.